Save. Share. Connect.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
VOLUME -23 NUMBER 9
Publication Date: 09/1/2008
Front Page News
People in the News
Electronic Mfg. Services
Electronic Mfg. Products
Special Feature: PCB and Assembly
Product Preview: ATExpo/IPC-MW
September 2008 Issue
Special Feature: PCB and Assembly
Add Message Board
Machine Vision for Factory Automation
Typical machine vision system consists of cameras, image processor, and a response system controller.
By Steve Geraghty, Vice President of US Operations, DALSA, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Key tasks in manufacturing, including inspection, orientation, identification, and assembly, require the use of visual techniques. Human vision and response, however, can be slow and tends to be error-prone, often due to boredom or fatigue. Replacing human inspection with machine vision can go far in automating factory operation, but implementers need to carefully match machine vision options with application requirements.
Nothing made by man beats human vision for versatility, but numerous human weaknesses limit human productivity in a manufacturing environment. Boredom, distraction, fatigue, Mother Nature's calls, and sometimes even malice can degrade human performance in vision-related factory tasks such as inspection. Factory automation utilizing a machine vision system in such tasks can bring many benefits. Machine vision systems can perform repetitive tasks faster and more accurately, with greater consistency than humans. They can reduce labor costs, increase production yields, and eliminate costly errors associated with incomplete or incorrect assembly. They can help automatically identify and correct manufacturing problems on-line by becoming part of the factory control network. The net result is greater productivity and improved customer satisfaction through the consistent delivery of quality products.
Implementing a cost-effective machine vision system, however, is not a casual task. The selection of components and system programming must accurately reflect the application's requirements. In addition, selection decisions need to consider more than the initial component costs. Factors such as the time required for system development, installation, and integration with the factory system, the operator training (and retraining) costs, project management, maintenance, and software upgrades and modification, all contribute to the total cost of ownership for the system and should be evaluated before investing in a specific system design.
Define the Requirements
One of the first places to begin in selecting a machine vision system for a factory automation task is to closely define the requirements. There are a number of critical questions to ask up front:
What task does the system need to perform?
Different tasks may require different vision attributes. Inspection requires an ability to examine objects in detail and evaluate the image to make pass/fail decisions. Assembly, on the other hand, requires the ability to scan an image to locate reference marks (called fiducials) and then use those marks to determine placement and orientation of parts. A machine vision system designed for the one task may not be well suited to the other.
What are the key visual performance criteria?
The vision system's camera and lens must perform at the right levels. Factors such as the smallest object or defect to detect, the measurement accuracy needed, the image size (field of view), speed of image capture and processing, and the need for color all affect camera and lens choices.
What are the environmental factors?
Some camera choices better suit stationary views while others are more suitable for handling linear object motion. Temperature, humidity, vibration, and the like can impose a need for specific system fabrication and assembly practices. The physical space available for installing the system can restrict camera and lens choices.
Beyond the system's physical requirements, developers should also consider the operational requirements. Questions to address include:
Who will program the system?
If the expertise to configure the system is not available in-house, the user must depend on third-party support to make changes and correct errors in the vision system's programming. If the system needs periodic changes, such as to inspect a new product line or to interface with new production equipment, the question of programming becomes particularly important. A system that has been set up for a single task so that the system integrator needs to reconfigure it for new settings can result in production systems being shut down for extended periods while alterations are underway. A system set up with enough flexibility to allow factory personnel to make such adjustments may cost more to create, but will save production time later.
A machine vision inspection system needs a delivery vehicle as well as a means of taking action when parts fail.
What equipment must the vision system interface with?
A vision system that only activates a solenoid to eject failed parts from a production line is considerably easier to implement than one that also reports results to a quality control network or that controls the operation of production equipment based on inspection results. Similarly, a system that must inform and enable a human operator has different needs than one that interfaces only to other machines.
What information must the system provide?
Machine vision systems in factory automation seldom operate in a standalone mode. Instead, they must send information to other parts of the factory enterprise for a variety of purposes. Quality traceability, for instance, requires that the vision system either log or report inspection results to the enterprise. Highly controlled operations, such as pharmaceutical manufacturing, may also require the logging of access to and changes made in the vision system, sending such data to a secure drive on the company network.
What are the operator requirements?
The extent to which human intervention into and control of the machine vision system is required can affect many system elements, particularly software. If operators are required to periodically change inspection criteria, such as the tolerances that will be accepted, the software must support such manipulation. Software may also need to provide security to prevent unauthorized access or parameter manipulation and include safeguards to avoid the introduction of erroneous values. Software design can affect the type and degree of training that operators will require as well as the ease of system maintenance and modification.
Building a System
While the answers to these operational and functional questions depend on the application, all machine vision systems for factory automation share some fundamental attributes and behaviors. Systems all have a need to image or inspect a scene or object, operating on a continuous basis at the fastest practical speed. Systems all operate by using these steps:
Position the object or camera so that the camera can view the object or scene.
Capture an image with a camera.
Process the image.
Take action based on the image processing results.
Communicate results to operators and other factory systems.
Because of this commonality, examination of a specific application such as inspection of objects on an assembly line will help illustrate the method by which developers can build a suitable machine vision system for their application.
The essential elements of an inspection system include a delivery vehicle, the vision system, the response system, and sensors to trigger image capture and system response. The delivery vehicle positions the object for inspection. The vision system, which includes camera, optics, lighting, and image processor, captures and processes the object image to determine a pass/fail response. The response system takes the required action as well as communicating results to operators or other systems. The sensors serve to trigger the vision and response systems, identifying when the object is positioned properly for the systems to perform their tasks. A first step in developing an inspection system, then, is to determine how the parts are to be placed in front of the camera for imaging. In this example, the delivery vehicle is a conveyer belt that carries the objects past the vision system at a constant speed. Other possible delivery vehicles include a part feeder, a robotic arm, or humans placing an object in a station for off-line inspections. Choosing a delivery system can often be the hardest part of a factory automation design because delivery choice will place restrictions on the remaining system choices, including camera, lighting, sensors, and response systems.
Triggering the System
With the delivery system chosen, developers can determine the most appropriate method for triggering the vision system to capture the image, and triggering the response system to take action. In the case of a conveyer belt delivery vehicle, an appropriate sensor might be electronic photo-eyes that produce a signal when the object passes between them. With other delivery vehicles, sensors such as proximity switches or programmable logic controllers (PLCs) could serve. Manual triggering by a human operator is also an option. The image capture, processing, and evaluation of results are tasks for the vision system. This system determines if the object being inspected is within acceptable quality tolerances and directs the response system as to what actions to take. A separate vision controller such as the Dalsa IPD Vision Appliance may handle the image processing and evaluation, or those functions may be integrated into a smart camera.
The parameters to be evaluated as well as the object characteristics strongly affect the camera, optics, and lighting needed in the vision system as well as the image processing software. The reading of an identification number requires close-up imaging, front lighting, and optical character recognition software. Inspection of packaged water aerators requires an entire package view and color imaging. Inspecting the fill level in a detergent bottle requires back lighting and the ability to detect the position of the liquid's surface.
Machine vision applications such as reading identification numbers (left), determining package contents (center), and verifying bottle fill levels (right) all require different imaging, lighting, and software.
With an appropriate vision system chosen and decision criteria determined, the last step is to define how the system is to respond to its decisions. In this example the vision controller triggers a PLC to push rejected parts off the conveyer to another delivery system, allowing acceptable parts to continue undisturbed. The controller may also send decision results to the factory enterprise for quality control and traceability purposes.
Machine vision is a key technology for improving the quality and productivity of manufacturing lines though factory automation. Carefully defining the vision system's task, understanding its performance criteria and technology limitations, and planning its integration into the factory flow are all critical steps toward a successful system design. Choosing a solution that will satisfy both current and long-term needs will help minimize the total cost of ownership and maximize the system's productive lifetime.
Contact: Dalsa, 605 McMurray Rd., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2V 2E9
514-333-1301 fax: 514-333-1388 E-mail: email@example.com Web:
© 2015 USTECH. All Rights Reserved. |
Contact Us: 610-783-6100 | firstname.lastname@example.org
powered by GIM